Edit on previous post: I just clicked on one of the pics and got the larger version with MRO and Di Bello in the name. Are these the higher res versions that he's been discussing?
Also (last one I promise) I think that picture 3 may be upside down. I can identify it much more as a city from that vantage point. Any chance of getting some orientation/lat_long/time data on these to see if the image has been imaged before?
What's the scale in the photos? I would especially like to know how big the feature in the center of Pic #2 is-- the one that looks like a tiered building with a bright white plaza in front of it and narrow, elevated walk-ways (or a very high rampart wall) to the left of it.
Well, I do see the photo tags now saying MRO, but I still think it looks very much like the rectilinear structures on Iapetus, the same stuff is all over the place there.
It looks like the whole "moon" is made of the structure. Which also leads to a more important point... the same type of construction is seen all over the solar system.
My money is on the fact that it was all built by the same people, at around the same time. Who ever migrated from the now destroyed planet (which is now the asteroid belt) sure left their mark.
I applaud your summary! I would also add that beings who engineer planets and/or entire solar systems can also do the same to DNA-- their own, or anybody else's. Therefore, they do not need our DNA to repair (hypothetical) damage to their own, as they can whip up biochemistry from scratch, so to speak.
They are also not here to eat our children, to harvest 'soul-stuff', or to mine gold, because with the kind of technology we are talking about (as in the made-in-space laser-proof ferrous silicate stuff found at Tunguska), they can make gold from scratch, too.
Even among people who credit UFOs and such, most just do not get how weird the technology is. If the Isaac/CARET stuff is true (and it does dovetail nicely with independent accounts by abductees/experiencers, other whistleblowers, etc.), the reason there are no welds, rivets, nails, screws, glued-together components, nuts and/or bolts found in any UFO is because everything on the ship is held in place by anti-gravity/stasis fields. Plus, the material forming all the structural elements of the ship does double-duty as part of the computer/computational matrix of the ship. Such a craft is both a flyable ship and its own brain, all at the same time.
Even my agile noodle conks out when I muse on the on-demand computational power that has to be embodied in a Mothership...
Honestly, I didn't really look at any of the images, and some of the movies I saw seemed whitewashed to me. I found it hard to really find anything on their web site, actually. It's a future project to go back and look at all the realsed data a little closer.
I did look at a movie of the floor of Tycho, but they didn't really get very close to some of the objects that interested me.
Yes, I have heard of the Earth being much larger than it was originally, but I'm not sure I buy the "cosmic dirt mover" theory. I won't say that it's impossible (reality is usually far stranger than the wildest speculation), I happen to think that the Earth just naturally grows via instreaming hyperdimentional energy.
I for one cannot wait to see the official Hoagland/Bara take on these AOTW pictures. I know the Enterprise Mission camp has been pretty silent lately which only mean one thing... something good is on it's way!
I did manage to hear Hoagie's last Coast chat that happened around the time of the Hubble mission and I was pretty shocked to hear him make such claims. I only hope that he's right on the money as usual, the implications are nothing short of monumental.
Interesting idea, and if the case, then there is the possibility of it being by design.
However, you're describing "matter from energy" in a fashion that even HDP may not yet have a foundation to explain.
Then again, the possibilities are limitless....
Even so, the "alien composition" suggests an alien source of materials.
Beyond this, we are reduced to speculation....
Except, that is, in the case of our Moon. It's arrival here 14,500 or so years ago was recorded by various cultures.
It made two close passes of the Earth (to set the two-body system in proper motion) and settled into its current well-maintained orbit.
I might add that it has been observed of late that (1) the Earth recently has begun moving away from the Sun, and (2) the Moon also has begun moving away from the Earth.
It sounds to me like the Moon is pulling us out from the Sun, albeit slowly. What I mean is, whoever is Up There at the helm is slowly hauling us out to a "safer orbit" for the duration of the current solar cycle, which some scientists speculate is going to be one wild ride.
From waves to string functions, and thence to particles from the quantum vacuum as per the model of Bearden-Bergman.
I had not thought of it that way. You propose an interesting mechanism. You may well be right.
And I must credit T'Zairis with pointing out the (possible) function of crop circles as active circuit elements on the Earth's surface.
We do indeed live in interesting times!
:-)
Hathor -- Ordering Chinese takeout...
;-)
P.S.: The string functions actually dislodge massless charge from the cubic array of such charges (the "quantum substrate") thus causing the freed charges to traverse the "Bergman heliocycloidal path" resulting in particles.
There's more to the story, but that is where particles come from.
Hey all! There is a rather interesting HiRISE image of the "Grand Canyon of Gale Crater". It was taken on March 3 of this year. It looks to me like it's a picture of water, of course the official explaination is probably "false color", but I'm sure you guys feel differently. ;)
"WASHINGTON – NASA could put a man on the moon but didn't have the sense to keep the original video of the live TV transmission. In an embarrassing acknowledgment, the space agency said Thursday that it must have erased the Apollo 11 moon footage years ago so that it could reuse the videotape."
Well said. I am astonished that no one of notable title has really cried fowl about this ongoing premise. Black and white, far off images, low res, blurred(as you said). Specs available for all these craft show quite outstanding capability, yet rarely do we see it or even anything remotely close to it.
My favorite, is all the high detail cameras that seem to have 'problems' at oddly perfect timing. Failing and then poof, working great again after.
Temples?
Mystery Pic#3
Edit on previous post: I just clicked on one of the pics and got the larger version with MRO and Di Bello in the name. Are these the higher res versions that he's been discussing?
ReplyDelete-S
Also (last one I promise) I think that picture 3 may be upside down. I can identify it much more as a city from that vantage point. Any chance of getting some orientation/lat_long/time data on these to see if the image has been imaged before?
ReplyDelete-S
What's the scale in the photos? I would especially like to know how big the feature in the center of Pic #2 is-- the one that looks like a tiered building with a bright white plaza in front of it and narrow, elevated walk-ways (or a very high rampart wall) to the left of it.
ReplyDeletePeace,
T'Zairis
"Columnar basalts!"
ReplyDeleteOh---sorry---I wasn't supposed
to say that, was I---
(LMAO)
Honestly, I couldn't guess. All at once,
it looks like the strangest comination of
natural AND unnatural features.
One second, "it's just rocks," and the next,
I'd swear that's a perfect cube I see over
at the lower left in photo #2....
Bizarre.
Got me on this one!
:-)
Hathor -- Using the magnifier...
;-)
P.S.: "Columnar basalts" with some obvious
landscaping thrown in???
Evidence of some sort of mining activity?
Ramps and roadways?
:-))))
The scale is - Big.
ReplyDeleteI see temples and bunkers, steps and ramps. Sorry I've guests in town for the next week but if I can I'll try to trace out some details.
Mike
Is this Iapetus? I haven't seen so many right angles since seeing the first few parts of "Moon With A View".
ReplyDeleteWell, I do see the photo tags now saying MRO, but I still think it looks very much like the rectilinear structures on Iapetus, the same stuff is all over the place there.
ReplyDeleteIt looks like the whole "moon" is made of the structure. Which also leads to a more important point... the same type of construction is seen all over the solar system.
My money is on the fact that it was all built by the same people, at around the same time. Who ever migrated from the now destroyed planet (which is now the asteroid belt) sure left their mark.
Agreed - in that it is a artificial not elemental creation. I'll leave it up to guys like Mike to interpret most likely what it is.
ReplyDeleteMarsandro--
ReplyDeleteI applaud your summary! I would also add that beings who engineer planets and/or entire solar systems can also do the same to DNA-- their own, or anybody else's. Therefore, they do not need our DNA to repair (hypothetical) damage to their own, as they can whip up biochemistry from scratch, so to speak.
They are also not here to eat our children, to harvest 'soul-stuff', or to mine gold, because with the kind of technology we are talking about (as in the made-in-space laser-proof ferrous silicate stuff found at Tunguska), they can make gold from scratch, too.
Even among people who credit UFOs and such, most just do not get how weird the technology is. If the Isaac/CARET stuff is true (and it does dovetail nicely with independent accounts by abductees/experiencers, other whistleblowers, etc.), the reason there are no welds, rivets, nails, screws, glued-together components, nuts and/or bolts found in any UFO is because everything on the ship is held in place by anti-gravity/stasis fields. Plus, the material forming all the structural elements of the ship does double-duty as part of the computer/computational matrix of the ship. Such a craft is both a flyable ship and its own brain, all at the same time.
Even my agile noodle conks out when I muse on the on-demand computational power that has to be embodied in a Mothership...
Peace,
T'Zairis
Mike - what is your take on the recently finished Japanese Kaguya orbiter, and whether it got any revealing photos of the moon?
ReplyDeleteD-19.5,
ReplyDeleteHonestly, I didn't really look at any of the images, and some of the movies I saw seemed whitewashed to me. I found it hard to really find anything on their web site, actually. It's a future project to go back and look at all the realsed data a little closer.
I did look at a movie of the floor of Tycho, but they didn't really get very close to some of the objects that interested me.
Yes, I have heard of the Earth being much larger than it was originally, but I'm not sure I buy the "cosmic dirt mover" theory. I won't say that it's impossible (reality is usually far stranger than the wildest speculation), I happen to think that the Earth just naturally grows via instreaming hyperdimentional energy.
ReplyDeleteI for one cannot wait to see the official Hoagland/Bara take on these AOTW pictures. I know the Enterprise Mission camp has been pretty silent lately which only mean one thing... something good is on it's way!
I did manage to hear Hoagie's last Coast chat that happened around the time of the Hubble mission and I was pretty shocked to hear him make such claims. I only hope that he's right on the money as usual, the implications are nothing short of monumental.
We're buried in the new material for the Revised Edition right now, that's why so silent.
ReplyDeleteThat plus I'm going out drinking a lot... :)
Hey Mike,
ReplyDeleteTake some of that blue
Hawaiian Punch...
...add a little Vodka...
...or maybe just a tablespoon of EverClear...
...and Voila!
"Romulan Ale!" :-))))
Starborne,
Interesting idea, and if the case, then there
is the possibility of it being by design.
However, you're describing "matter from
energy" in a fashion that even HDP may not
yet have a foundation to explain.
Then again, the possibilities are limitless....
Even so, the "alien composition" suggests an
alien source of materials.
Beyond this, we are reduced to speculation....
Except, that is, in the case of our Moon.
It's arrival here 14,500 or so years ago
was recorded by various cultures.
It made two close passes of the Earth (to
set the two-body system in proper motion)
and settled into its current well-maintained
orbit.
I might add that it has been observed of late
that (1) the Earth recently has begun moving
away from the Sun, and (2) the Moon also
has begun moving away from the Earth.
It sounds to me like the Moon is pulling us
out from the Sun, albeit slowly. What I mean
is, whoever is Up There at the helm is slowly
hauling us out to a "safer orbit" for the
duration of the current solar cycle, which
some scientists speculate is going to be
one wild ride.
:-)
Hathor -- Immersed in The New Physics
;-)
P.S.: And Mike, WATCH IT with the EverClear....
That's * 200 proof * !!!!!
(Well you knew that, didn't you!)
:-)p
Good point, Starborne!
ReplyDeleteFrom waves to string functions,
and thence to particles from the
quantum vacuum as per the model of
Bearden-Bergman.
I had not thought of it that way. You propose
an interesting mechanism. You may well be
right.
And I must credit T'Zairis with pointing
out the (possible) function of crop circles
as active circuit elements on the Earth's
surface.
We do indeed live in interesting times!
:-)
Hathor -- Ordering Chinese takeout...
;-)
P.S.: The string functions actually dislodge
massless charge from the cubic array of such
charges (the "quantum substrate") thus
causing the freed charges to traverse the
"Bergman heliocycloidal path" resulting in
particles.
There's more to the story, but that is where
particles come from.
:-)
Hey all! There is a rather interesting HiRISE image of the "Grand Canyon of Gale Crater". It was taken on March 3 of this year. It looks to me like it's a picture of water, of course the official explaination is probably "false color", but I'm sure you guys feel differently. ;)
ReplyDeleteOh, hehe.... here's the link.
ReplyDeletehttp://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/
ESP_012195_1750
I'd love to see a real example of what you are arguing.
ReplyDeleteI highly doubt disclosure is possible, but maybe when people can take cruise ships to the moon it will have to be.
ReplyDeleteThis looks like it could easily be a piece of rock or something as seen from a microscope.
ReplyDeleteTHESE ARE REAL SATELLITE IMAGES!
ReplyDeleteFascinating---
ReplyDeleteIt looks almost like some sort
of carbon scoring left by some
kind of hot boring machine.
Notice the way it is imbedded in the crater.
It's as if something started to bore its way
underground, then stopped and backed out
of the hole.
:-)
Hathor -- Noting the peak reading on the
Weird Meter
;-)
From the Associated Press:
ReplyDelete"WASHINGTON – NASA could put a man on the moon but didn't have the sense to keep the original video of the live TV transmission. In an embarrassing acknowledgment, the space agency said Thursday that it must have erased the Apollo 11 moon footage years ago so that it could reuse the videotape."
Silly NASA - how could they be so "careless"?
Any fool would know to
ReplyDeletearchive something of that
nature.
One wonders what they were so concerned
that someone might notice....
So perhaps the "original" tape needed, uh,
"editing," for archival purposes...
...and they had to make sure that they got
rid of the evidence....
It's like all this blurry crap we get from
multimillion dollar space probes. A $199
SONY HandyCam from WalMart can do a
far better job.
And for $399, you can get 1080p HiDef with
200X electronic zoom.
:-)
Hathor -- In the cutting room
;-)
Well said. I am astonished that no one of notable title has really cried fowl about this ongoing premise.
ReplyDeleteBlack and white, far off images, low res, blurred(as you said).
Specs available for all these craft show quite outstanding capability, yet rarely do we see it or even anything remotely close to it.
My favorite, is all the high detail cameras that seem to have 'problems' at oddly perfect timing. Failing and then poof, working great again after.