Ok, I just got back from my trip to Las Vegas and LA. The lecture went really well. I'll be getting back to issues on this blog over the next few days.
JimO,
I'm now ready to address any grievances you have against me regarding the issues you keep bringing up. If you could just put them into a concise, bulleted list so I can address them one by one, rather than have to troll through numerous emails and blog posts, I would appreciate it. You can either post it here or send it to my private email. Please express a preference as to whether you'd like a public or private response. I'll have it for you in a few days, after I get caught up on bills and such.
Mike
OK, more hoops for me to jump through... how about from my email to you on November 02, 2007 9:49 AM:
ReplyDeleteFact. I did not ever urge anyone to alter in any way Ken's status in the Solar System Ambassador program. I have told Mike this. He has ignored my statements.
I was not a "colleague of Ken's" in Houston during the Apollo program -- in truth, I was never IN Houston during the Apollo program.
I did not refer to Ken's views as "crackpot" anythings -- the Russian text attributes that phrase to me based only on Bara's sloppy writing.
Mike wrote that I "knew full well [Ken's credentials] were valid," which is untrue. What I found out was that Ken worked in lunar sampling documentation, was a 'manager' of nobody but himself, and officially dealt only with photographs of the lunar samples themselves -- not scenary shots from orbit, or elsewhere.
Mike's throwing around words like 'integrity' and 'ethics' in his falsifying about me would be amusing, if it hadn't been so widely picked up, especially in Russia.
What Successes ?
ReplyDeleteMan has never walked on the Moon - the very fact that the NEW Apollo has to be radically different . . .
People do answer questions, but anything that refutes Mike Bara's point of view is suppressed. This post will undoubtedly be suppressed, too.
ReplyDeleteActually expat, the only thing that gets "suppressed" on this blog is when members repeat posts\arguments that have already been proven wrong.
ReplyDeleteLike yours.