tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4063802215119596545.post4148603426724421100..comments2023-12-13T15:01:10.195-08:00Comments on MIKE BARA.com: LRO Images the Apollo Landing SitesMike Barahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17172462170076618847noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4063802215119596545.post-54005026752583109262009-07-31T10:39:59.298-07:002009-07-31T10:39:59.298-07:00Jim,If you are too lazy to look up the lat. and lo...Jim,<br><br>If you are too lazy to look up the lat. and long. of the Apollo 12, 14and 17 landing sites, don't blame me. <br><br>Too bad they didn't put a color camera on LRO. That would sure make it more interesting, for obvious reasons.<br><br>And try this one: 6 degrees N, 28 degrees W, between Hortensius and Hortensius C. But I want to see it the same day it is taken, without any 6 month "processing" period.Mike Barahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17172462170076618847noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4063802215119596545.post-49566074482816332592009-07-31T09:16:23.363-07:002009-07-31T09:16:23.363-07:00These images show awesome resolution. All we need ...These images show awesome resolution. All we need now is for you to provide the lat/longs of claimed anomalous structures and we'll see if LRO images those areas -- and what it shows. Also -- SMART, Change-eh, the Indian probe, the Japanese probe -- all those lunar observers of recent years whose pictures somehow never seem to show what the long-ago NASA shots are said to show. Whyever not?<br><br>Where should it observe?<br><br>Don't just say, 'over there by Proclus', or 'on the limb east of Crisium' -- give real lunar lat/longs.<br><br>Or tell us why you won't.JimOhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14320277948525739714noreply@blogger.com